You are currently browsing the archives for the Engineering Judgement category.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
25/09/2011 by TDS.
Article Link: Judgement Call
“…I cannot get too excited about whether every last ‘i’ is dotted, or every ‘t’ crossed. And I don’t believe the HSE can either…”
Another article from the ‘Engineering Judgement’ series. Comments and discussion welcome.
Posted in Engineering Judgement | No Comments »
15/08/2011 by TDS.
Article Link: Risk Assessment Tools
“…Far from being a ‘massaging’ of the numbers, this is the proper and responsible approach of the professional engineer. There is a world of difference between modifying a risk assessment because it is not judged sensible and because it does not fit the budget….”
This article was awarded the IChemE’s Frank Lees Medal 2010. Comments and discussion welcome.
Posted in Engineering Judgement | No Comments »